WebAnswer: Yes. Conclusion: The injury alleged by Pincay and McCarron was the act of paying more than 5% of their yearly income to the Andrews. "The plaintiff is deemed to have had … Web1992, a jury returned verdicts in Pincay’s favor on both the RICO and California counts. Pincay was ordered to elect one remedy or the other; he chose the RICO judgment. On appeal, this judgment was reversed on the basis of the federal statute of limitations. Pincay v. Andrews, 238 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2001). On remand, Pincay elected the ...
PINCAY v. ANDREWS 367 F.3d 1087 (2004) 3d108711346 Leagle.com
WebJun 24, 2004 · Pincay was ordered to elect a remedy, and he chose to pursue the RICO judgment. This judgment was reversed on appeal on the ground that the RICO claim was … WebOct 2, 2000 · The jury found that Pincay would not have invested in 29 ventures, and McCarron would not have invested in 13 ventures, but for the Andrews' unlawful conduct. The jury awarded Pincay $670,685 and McCarron $313,000 in compensatory damages for their state and RICO claims. guns and hoses golf tournament 2023
PINCAY v. ANDREWS 238 F.3d 1106 (2001)
WebOct 2, 2000 · 238 F.3d 1106 (2001) Laffit Pincay, Jr.; Christopher J. McCarron, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Vincent S. Andrews; Robert L. Andrews; Vincent Andrews … WebNov 15, 2004 · The underlying dispute began in 1989 when Laffit Pincay, Jr. and Christopher McCarron (Pincay) sued Vincent S. Andrews, Robert L. Andrews, and Vincent Andrews … WebAug 12, 2016 · 1. Defendant argues that the district court abused its discretion when denying Defendant's motion because of the plea agreement's appellate waiver, as opposed to either of the applicable standards under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 (b) (4). We review for abuse of discretion. Pincay v. Andrews, 389 F.3d 853, 858 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc). bowtech financing